-Says CPP speak recklessly and irresponsibly

Chief Justice of Liberia

The Supreme Court in a release issued June 23 said it considers the statement by the CPP as “reckless, irresponsible and without any iota of truth,” as the Court has in no way violated any provisions of the Constitution.

MONROVIA, June 23 (LINA) – The Supreme Court of Liberia says it takes note of a recent statement issued in Monrovia by the Collaborating Political Parties (CPP), in which the CPP accused the Court and the National Elections Commission (NEC) of “a deliberate and unjustified violation of the Liberian Constitution.”

The CPPN was speaking regarding the election case which emanated from Grand Cape Mount County involving CPP’s candidate, Simeon B. Taylor, and the Coalition for Democratic Change (CDC)’s candidate, Victor V. Watson.

The Supreme Court in a release issued June 23 said it considers the statement by the CPP as “reckless, irresponsible and without any iota of truth,” as the Court has in no way violated any provisions of the Constitution.

“The statement of the CPP is yet another attempt by politicians to unduly draw the Court into politics, set the people against the Court and undermine respect for the rule of law,” the Court noted..

It said “While the Court does not usually dignify false reports of its decisions and/or actions in the media with a response, it is, however, constrained at this time, due to the high level of deliberate misrepresentation contained in the CPP’s statement, to set the record straight.

The Supreme Court pointed out that it has the constitutional duty to hear and decide all appeals from the Board of Commissioners of the NEC in election cases to ensure that the true desire of the people, through their votes, is protected and upheld.

The court said in all such cases, “fairness is the prime objective. And in executing this constitutional mandate, the Court has the exclusive power to affirm, reverse or modify decisions of the NEC.”

It added that “he Court may also reverse and remand cases with instructions to the NEC to conduct further investigations in such election cases where the Court determines that the investigations conducted by the NEC were not thorough and conclusive for a fair decision.

“An appeal from the ruling of the Board of Commissioners of the NEC in the referenced case was taken to the Supreme Court by the CDC; the case was argued, and the Court rendered an opinion within the constitutional timeframe of seven days after hearing.

“In the said opinion, the Court reversed the final ruling of the Board of Commissioners of the NEC and in its judgment, remanded the case to the NEC and instructed the NEC to take seize of the matter and conduct further investigation into the case.

The Supreme Court judgment, in an excerpt, reads “…it is the law in this jurisdiction that the subordinate courts (administrative fora) should decide all pertinent issues squarely raised before them; that there were serious allegations [in this case], such as pre-marked ballots, stopping of poll watchers from entering polling places and forgery of poll watchers’ signatures on the senate records of count made by the appellant in this case which warrant thorough investigation by the hearing officer and which the hearing officer did not pass upon, for if indeed there are merits in these allegations, they could be grounds for rerun in the affected areas.

“That this court has consistently held that the NEC is an administrative forum for fact finding and summary investigation; hence being the sole custodian of all records made in this case, it was incumbent upon the NEC to have investigated all of the appellants’ allegation and taken appropriate decision;”

The press release said on the mandate and instruction of the Supreme Court, the NEC resumed jurisdiction over the case for full investigation, especially in those areas as indicated in the Court’s Judgment.

It said the case was therefore removed from the Supreme Court back to the NEC.

And since that time, no party has filed a complaint with the Court regarding the execution of the mandate given to the NEC by this Court; neither has any party come back to the Court on an appeal.

“So, what is the basis of the CPP’s assertion to the Liberian public and the whole world that the Supreme Court is delaying this election case thereby threatening the peace and security of this country?” the Court asked.

The Supreme Court said, it is “particularly concerned about the constant threatening statements by politicians against members of the Court and subordinate courts.”

The court that it  has “become common  in Liberia today for politicians, knowing the vulnerability and gullibility of the Liberian people, to denigrate the Court, incite members of the public to violence, chaos, and instability whenever cases are not decided in their favor.”

“These actions of politicians have brought members of the Liberian Judiciary, including Justices and Judges, to personal danger in recent times,” the Supreme Court observed.

The press release pointed out that the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of Liberia and judges of subordinate courts, being cognizant of the fact that the fair and impartial administration of the rule of law is sine qua non to democracy, peace, and prosperity of the Liberian Nation.

They have, and will always uphold, protect and defend the Constitution and laws of this Republic, “no matter who or what is involved.”

Source: LINA

Leave a Comment


No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *